Essays
In this Church Times article published July 24, 2026 in the Notebook column, Rupert reflects on the revival of patronal festivals – when parishes celebrate the feast day of their patron saint – and Rogation parish-boundary walks, and makes the case for gratitude and graces before meals as practices linked to greater happiness and health.
ON TRINITY SUNDAY, about 50 pilgrims gathered for blessings beside a spring under an ancient sycamore tree at Hawkwood, near Stroud. We walked through the woods and fields of the Slad Valley for choral evensong in Holy Trinity, Slad, sung by the choir of All Saints’, Stroud. The church was full, and afterwards there were delicious refreshments on the terrace of the Woolpack Inn just across the road, made famous by Laurie Lee’s memoir Cider with Rosie. There were happy faces everywhere.
This was one of about 150 newly revived, evensong-based patronal festivals or feasts of title being celebrated this year in parish churches across the UK. In many parishes, this is the first time that the church’s festival has been observed in living memory. Bells have rung out before services; some parishes combined the festival with a fête, formed community choirs specially for the occasion, welcomed school choirs, or sponsored local pilgrimages. Receptions were held in churches, churchyards, village halls, and barns. Practically all were great successes. In some churches, there was standing room only.
- Details
See Full Article
Related Research
Telecommunication Telepathy: A Meta-Analysis
PDF
Journal of Anomalous Experience and Cognition (2025)
by Rupert Sheldrake, Tom Stedall, Patrizio Tressoldi
In this DailyMail article from Jan 4, 2026 Rupert argues that telephone telepathy is a real phenomenon, citing his own statistical experiments as well as anecdotes from Dame Judi Dench and others.
DURING a tour of West Africa, where she was performing Shakespeare, a young Judi Dench was seized by a suden premonition.
‘This was in the middle of lunch,’ she said, ‘and it was so strong that I asked if I could phone home to England, in a total stranger’s house. ‘I rang home and Daddy had just had a serious heart attack... and I sensed it thousands of miles away.’
Dame Judi, who tells this story in her 2010 autobiography And Furthermore, possesses a great wealth of theatrical tall tales which she tells with her unique dramatic flair. But this one is presented as simple fact. She believes, beyond doubt, that some telepathic sense told her that her family were desperate to speak with her.
- Details
In this DailyMail article from April 19, 2025 Rupert weighs in on the biggest question of all, along with several influential thinkers from the arts and sciences. Below is Rupert's answer—see the PDF for answers from Paulo Coelho, Uri Geller, Carlo Rovelli, Elif Shafak, Lord Sumption, Rabbi Dr Jonathan Romain MBE, and Libby Purves OBE.
MY speculation is that we can go on dreaming after we die, but we can’t wake up because we no longer have a physical body to wake up in. We are ‘trapped’ in a dreamworld.
All of us dream, even if we forget most of them, and in our dreams we have another body – a dream body – in which we move around, talk to people, sometimes even fly. Our dream body is obviously different from our normal physical body, which is lying asleep in bed.
- Details
DailyMail, Jan 17th 2025
by Rupert Sheldrake
Honey is deaf. She’s a liver-and-white Brittany spaniel, a breed originally used for hunting, and she has an intriguing ability: Honey can be fast asleep and yet she knows when a human is staring at her.
‘If someone is looking at her, she will wake up, even if she is in a dream or deep sleep,’ her owner told me.
To anyone who is curious about how the mind works, this is fascinating. Honey can’t be reacting to an audio cue, such as a voice or a footstep, because she’s completely deaf. And, of course, she’s asleep, so she can’t see movement.
- Details
DailyMail, June 20, 2024
by Rupert Sheldrake
Piglet the Jack Russell seemed to be fading away. He was half blind, barely able to walk and spent most of his days asleep.
But one morning, as his loving owner steeled herself to have him euthanised, Piglet seemed to be rejuvenated. He ran around the garden with the family’s other dogs, wagging his tail, then settled on the sofa to be brushed, his favourite activity.
As his owner placed the brush back in its box, Piglet suffered a seizure and died in her arms. His brief recovery was a little-understood occurrence seen in both humans and animals, sometimes called ‘the last rally’ and known in Spanish as ‘mejoría de la muerte’ (literally, ‘the improvement of death’).
- Details
DailyMail, May 24th 2024
by Rupert Sheldrake
A creature of habit, Judge the pit bull terrier liked to go to bed at 9pm—not in his own basket, but in his humans' bed.
'Every night,' his owner said, 'he would stop in the dining room and look at us for a few seconds as if to say, "You sure you're not coming?" Then he would walk on by and go to bed.'
When Judge died from kidney failure his owners were heartbroken. 'We cried like babies. We loved him so much.'
- Details
DailyMail, Dec 8, 2023
by Rupert Sheldrake
Have you ever felt you were being watched? Almost everybody has. It's a scientific phenomenon that is universal.
More than 80 per cent of women, and nearly three-quarters of men, questioned in Britain, the U. S. and Scandinavia, say they have experienced it — turning around to find someone staring at them, or looking at someone from behind who turned and looked back.
Numerous studies have proved that the sensation can be reproduced under rigorous laboratory conditions. Those who watch people for a living, such as private detectives and celebrity photographers, have no doubt it's real. Professionals who use long-range lenses, including paparazzi and snipers, know the moment when the target senses their gaze and looks straight at them.
- Details
Steven Pinker's denialism reveals the prejudice of the scientific establishment
UnHerd, November 22, 2021
by Rupert Sheldrake
Steven Pinker likes to portray himself as an exemplar of science fighting against a rising tide of unreason. But in relation to phenomena that go against his own beliefs, he is remarkably irrational himself: he asserts that evidence is not required to assess the reality of phenomena he does not believe in, because they cannot possibly be true. How can a champion of rationality adopt such double standards?
In his new book Rationality, Pinker is adamantly opposed to telepathy and other kinds of extra-sensory perception (ESP). His position is that they do not happen because they cannot happen. He freely admits that he pre-judges the evidence by claiming that these purported phenomena are extremely improbable, assigning them an infinitesimal “prior probability”, in the language of Bayesian statistics. He acknowledges that “believing in something before you look at the evidence may seem like the epitome of irrationality”, but he justifies his refusal to look at the evidence by classifying these phenomena as “paranormal’, lumping them together with seemingly unrelated topics like homeopathy, astrology and miracles.
- Details
Introduction
Plant and animal cells can be grown outside the organism they come from, and some can be propagated in cell cultures within laboratory glassware for years. Through morphic resonance, if some cells from the culture adapt to a new challenge, similar cells should be able to adapt to the same challenge more rapidly even when they are separated.
There is already evidence that such an effect takes place. Miroslav Hill, a cell biologist, made a very surprising discovery when he was Director of Research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique in Villejuif, France in the 1980s. Cells seemed to influence other similar cells at a distance.
Hill and his colleagues were working with cell cultures derived from hamsters. They were trying to find mutant cells resistant to thioguanine, a toxin. The standard procedure was to expose cells to the poison and see if any survived as a result of rare random mutations enabling them to resist it. None did.
- Details
In this paper, published in The Secular Heretic, Rupert discusses his hypothesis of morphic fields, connections with quantum physics, experiments on morphic fields, and the role of morphic resonance in biology and human learning.
Morphic fields underlie the organization of animals, plants, cells, proteins, crystals, brains and minds. They help to explain habits, memories, instincts, telepathy and the sense of direction. They have an inherent memory. They imply that many of the so-called laws of nature are more like habits.
This is, of course, a controversial hypothesis.
- Details
From Resurgence & Ecologist, Jan/Feb 2016, page 56
choralevensong.orgI was an atheist when I was an undergraduate at Cambridge and for several years afterwards, yet I still went to choral evensong because I found it so inspiring and uplifting. Whatever your religious faith, or lack of it, no one is going to question you about your beliefs or your motives when you attend.
- Details
Nature, September 1, 2015. Reproduced by courtesy of Nature Publishing Group. The world of science is in the midst of unprecedented soul-searching at present. The credibility of science rests on the widespread assumption that results are replicable, and that high standards are maintained by anonymous peer review. These pillars of belief are crumbling. In September 2015, the international scientific journal Nature published a cartoon showing the temple of “Robust Science” in a state of collapse. What is going on?
Drug companies sounded an alarm several years ago. They were concerned that an increasing proportion of clinical trials was failing, and that much of their research effort was being wasted. When they looked into the reasons for their lack for success, they realized that they were basing projects on scientific papers published in peer-reviewed journals, on the assumption that most of the results were reliable. But when they looked more closely, they found that most of these papers, even those in top-tier academic journals, were not reproducible. In 2011, German researchers in the drug company Bayer found in an extensive survey that more than 75% of the published findings could not be validated.
- Details
One of the biggest controversies in twentieth-century biology was about the inheritance of acquired characteristics, the ability of animals and plants to inherit adaptations acquired by their ancestors. For example, if a dog was terrified of butchers because he had been mistreated by one, his offspring would tend to inherit his fear. Charles Darwin wrote a letter to Nature describing just such a case. The opposing view, promoted by the science of genetics, asserted that organisms could not inherit features their ancestors had acquired; they only passed on genes that they themselves had inherited.
In Darwin's day, most people assumed that acquired characteristics could indeed be inherited. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck took this for granted in his theory of evolution published more than 50 years before Darwin's, and the inheritance of acquired characters is often referred to as "Lamarckian inheritance." Darwin shared Lamarck's assumption and cited many examples to support it in his book The Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication (1875).
- Details
Resurgence & Ecologist 2013
by Rupert Sheldrake
When I was growing up in Nottinghamshire, I was fortunate to have not just one but two secret gardens. The first was from my earliest years. Near the centre of my hometown, Newark-on-Trent, there was a large walled enclosure owned by the parish church, which contained about six gardens. We had one of them, bounded on one side by the high wall between the garden and the street, and on the other three sides by tall hedges.
- Details
Wikipedia is a wonderful invention. But precisely because it's so trusted and convenient, people with their own agendas keep trying to take it over. Editing wars are common. According to researchers at Oxford University, the most controversial subjects worldwide include Israel and God.
This is not surprising. Everyone knows that there are opposing views on politics and religion, and many people recognise a biased account when they see it. But in the realm of science, things are different. Most people have no scientific expertise and believe that science is objective. Their trust is now being abused systematically by a highly motivated group of activists called Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia.
- Details
Explore 2013; 9:211-218
by Rupert Sheldrake
PDF 
Contemporary science is based on the claim that all reality is material or physical. There is no reality but material reality. Consciousness is a by-product of the physical activity of the brain. Matter is unconscious. Evolution is purposeless. This view is now undergoing a credibility crunch. The biggest problem of all for materialism is the existence of consciousness. Panpsychism provides a way forward. So does the recognition that minds are not confined to brains.
Topics
- The Scientific Creed
- The Credibility Crunch for the “Scientific Worldview”
- Is Matter Unconscious?
- Minds That Deny Their Own Reality
- Panpsychist Alternatives
- Conscious and Unconscious Minds
- Minds Beyond Brains
- Scientific Futures
Russian Translation: Освобождая науку от материализма
- Details
In the course of my research on the unexplained human abilities, more than 150 people have told me about an experience that I had never before seen discussed. To their surprise, they thought about a friend or acquaintance for no particular reason, and then shortly afterward met that person. No one thinks it strange if he meets someone he was expecting to meet, or someone he encounters frequently. It is with unexpected meetings that the phenomenon is so striking. For example, Andreas Thomopoulos, a film director from Athens, was visiting Paris with his wife. "Walking through the streets, we thought of a close student friend of mine in London. We wondered how he was nowadays since I hadn't seen him for over twenty years. Shortly after, on going around a corner, we bumped straight into him!" Mary Flanagan, of Hoboken, New Jersey, had a similar experience: "Walking down the street, I was thinking of someone I had not seen or spoken to for three years and who lives in a different city. I met her on the street about ten minutes after I started thinking about her."
- Details
The simplest and cheapest of all reforms within institutional science is to switch from the passive to the active voice in writing about science. Many people have already made this change, but some teachers in schools and universities do not realise that they and their students are free to write more naturally.
The idealized objectivity of science is reflected in the use of the passive voice in many science reports: "A test tube was taken..." instead of "I took a test tube." All research scientists know that writing in the passive voice is artificial; they are not disembodied observers, but people doing research. Technocrats also use the passive voice to give their reports an air of scientific authority, dressing up opinions as objective facts.
The passive style did not become fashionable in science until the end of the nineteenth century. Earlier scientists like Isaac Newton, Michael Faraday and Charles Darwin used the active voice. The passive was introduced to make science seem more objective, impersonal and professional. Its heyday in the scientific literature was from 1920 to 1970. But times are changing. Many scientists abandoned this convention in the 1970s and 1980s.
- Details
In mechanistic biology, a sharp distinction is drawn between innate and learned behaviour: the former is assumed to be 'genetically programmed' or 'coded' in the DNA, while the latter is supposed to result from physical and chemical changes in the nervous system. There is no conceivable way in which such changes could specifically modify the DNA, as the Lamarckian theory would require; it is therefore considered impossible for learned behaviour acquired by an animal to be inherited by its offspring (excluding, of course, 'cultural inheritance', whereby the offspring learn patterns of behaviour from their parents or other adults).
By contrast, according to the hypothesis of formative causation, there is no difference in kind between innate and learned behaviour: both depend on motor fields given by morphic resonance (Section 10. 1). This hypothesis therefore admits a possible transmission of learned behaviour from one animal to another, and leads to testable predictions which differ not only from those of the orthodox theory of inheritance, but also from those of the Lamarckian theory, and from inheritance through epigenetic modifications of gene expression.
- Details
Physics is based on the assumption that certain fundamental features of nature are constant. Some constants are considered to be more fundamental than others, including the velocity of light c and the Universal Gravitational Constant, known to physicists as Big G. Unlike the constants of mathematics, such as p, the values of the constants of nature cannot be calculated from first principles: they depend on laboratory measurements. As the name implies, the physical constants are supposed to be changeless. They are believed to reflect an underlying constancy of nature, part of the standard assumption of physics that the laws and constants of nature are fixed forever.
Are the constants really constant? The measured values continually change, as I show in my book Science Set Free (The Science Delusion in the UK). They are regularly adjusted by international committees of experts know as metrologists. Old values are replaced by new "best values", based on the recent data from laboratories around the world.
- Details
Before 2012 slips away it's worth remembering that this is the fiftieth anniversary of the publication of Thomas Kuhn's hugely influential book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which was itself revolutionary, and has sold more than a million copies worldwide. Almost every time you hear the word 'paradigm', Kuhn's book is in the background.
Kuhn made it clear that science is not simply devoted to the rational pursuit of truth, but is subject to human foibles, ambitions, emotions, and peer-group pressures. A paradigm is a theory of reality, a model of the way in which research can be done, and a consensus within a professional group. At any given time anomalies that do not fit into the paradigm are rejected or ignored, and 'normal science' goes on within the agreed framework. But at times of scientific revolution, 'one conceptual world view is replaced by another'; the framework itself is enlarged to include anomalies that were previously unexplained. Some well-known examples of major paradigm shifts are the Copernican revolution in astronomy, the Darwinian theory of evolution, and the relativity and quantum revolutions in twentieth century physics.
- Details
